Original post by 06hch2

Original post by sandman423

Original post by vioarc

Original post by Benton

2008 Honda Element

We get a lot of interesting emails in the AutoblogGreen inbox. Some of them provide good tips or lead us to stories of people doing amazing things. Some just make us laugh. And some just ask us a question we’re just not able to help (no, I can’t tell you how to order ethanol in Africa. Sorry). A message we got today is a blend - part good idea for a post, part need more info. Here’s the note from reader Kelsey:

I have a 2006 Honda Element. I’m trying to find any information available about how bad my SUV is for the environment, according to how much I drive and how I use it, etc. I keep finding articles that deal with the “greenest” cars, even the ones that are the worst, but not a lot about specific cars like mine. Any suggestions on where to look? Thanks for the help!

It’s not hard to find sites that take SUVs to task - and with good reason. For most people, these giant rides are just overkill and a more reasonable vehicle should certainly be on their radar. Still, while we’re not interested in the anti-SUV sites right now; we should also shy away from the types of stories that say a Hummer is better than a Prius. That’s just not true.

In Kelsey’s case, the best place to start is the Element’s miles per gallon. This is one of the areas where we have the numbers available. According to the EPA, a 2006 Element with 2WD, an automatic 4 speed transmission and the 4 cyl, 2.4 L gets 19/24mpg city/highway (the manual gets 19/23 and and the 4WD versions are similar). As Kelsey writes, how much the vehicle is driven and the driving style plays a huge role in the Element’s impact on the environment. But for now, let’s stick to the averages. Kelsey, feel free to chime in with a comment to let us know how accurate these numbers are. Read more after the jump.

Continue reading Reader Question: How bad is my SUV?

Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Sebastian Blanco

Original post by Jason

Original post by Jason

The modern definition of a hybrid vehicle is any single machine with multiple sources of power. Usually, this means one internal combustion engine and one electric motor with batteries. This is again the case with the Biohazard Jet Bike, though its internal combustion engine happens to be a propane-fed turbine engine which spins at up to 112,000 revolutions per minute and produces forty-five pounds of thrust. The electric motor is powered by twenty-four volts of juice and is said to be good for eighteen miles per hour for up to twenty miles.

The bike also has pedals, though they are non-functional. From the looks of things, much of the cycle comes from the pedal-powered world, with a front fork and wheels cribbed from the bike world for sure. Still, this machine looks like lots of fun, and jet engines have been known to run on nearly any combustible fuel, including our personal favorite: biodiesel.

Related:

• Inventive minds attach a jet engine to a Honda Ruckus

[Source: eBay Motors]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Jeremy Korzeniewski

At the big unveiling of the Chevy Volt, GM said the vehicle would be able to hold 12 gallons of liquid fuel and be able to go 640 miles on that energy and what was stored in the batteries. Well, that announcement was 18 months ago and things have changed since then. The latest that we’ve heard about is that the liquid fuel tank will be something smaller than the original estimate.

Kicking Tires quotes “a source” that says that the exact size of the smaller tank is not yet set but that, “We’re working on that.” The new goal is to give the Volt a range of 360 miles without any help from the initial charge, so that would imply a tank of maybe eight or so gallons - still plenty for most drivers most days in a PHEV like this. While the aerodynamics of the Volt have proven to be much more important than weight when it comes to increasing the miles per gallon number, every bit counts. We’re waiting on a reply from GM to see if the smaller fuel tank move is official.

UPDATE: GM’s response was that they will share “the detailed technical information on the production vehicle at the appropriate time.”

[Source: Kicking Tires]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Sebastian Blanco

At the big unveiling of the Chevy Volt, GM said the vehicle would be able to hold 12 gallons of liquid fuel and be able to go 640 miles on that energy and what was stored in the batteries. Well, that announcement was 18 months ago and things have changed since then. The latest that we’ve heard about is that the liquid fuel tank will be something smaller than the original estimate.

Kicking Tires quotes “a source” that says that the exact size of the smaller tank is not yet set but that, “We’re working on that.” The new goal is to give the Volt a range of 360 miles without any help from the initial charge, so that would imply a tank of maybe eight or so gallons - still plenty for most drivers most days in a PHEV like this. While the aerodynamics of the Volt have proven to be much more important than weight when it comes to increasing the miles per gallon number, every bit counts. We’re waiting on a reply from GM to see if the smaller fuel tank move is official.

[Source: Kicking Tires]

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

Original post by Sebastian Blanco