California voters approve $10 billion for high speed train
Saturday, November 8th, 2008Filed under: Transportation Alternatives, Green Daily

California, say hello to the bullet train. In the big election America held on Tuesday, one transportation-related measure that passed was California’s Proposition 1A, named the “Safe, Reliable High Speed Passenger Train Bond Act.” Its passage means that almost $10 billion in bond money was approved for an electric train route that will connect San Francisco and Sacramento with Southern California (LA and down to San Diego). Clean transportation advocates are pretty thrilled with the vote, calling it “a clear affirmation of high-speed trains” and saying that better public transportation was “critical to solving global warming and creating real energy independence” as ENS reports. Once completed, the state estimates that a LA to San Francisco trip will take two and a half hours and cost $55. Learn all about the plans for the new train here.
When we first mentioned this train back in March, some of you were skeptical that it would ever pass. What say you now?
[Source: State of California, ENS, TreeHugger]
California voters approve $10 billion for high speed train originally appeared on AutoblogGreen on Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:47:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments
Original post by Sebastian Blanco







I′m not in favor of firefighters burning books but I really liked the vision of future transport in Ray Bradbury’s scif-fi classic Fahrenheit 451. As you can see in the video above, Montag, a book-burning firefighter, must walk home quite a distance after taking the train. There are no cars on the road but you do see people riding bikes. I don’t think I have seen a more green vision of the future of transport in a movie which is kinda shocking considering the novel was published in 1953 and François Truffaut made the film in 1966. Maybe I missed the point of the exclusive use of public transport and the complete exclusion of cars except for use by the firemen who burn books? Maybe it was commenting on the fascist, utopian views of a society that would burn books? I still think it’s cool. What do you think 

