Archive for the ‘Journalism & The Media’ Category

Tesla asks for $400 M. loan

Sunday, November 30th, 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/bu…digi.html?_r=1

Quote:

. . . The company is requesting $400 million in low-interest federal loans as part of the $25 billion loan package for the auto industry passed by Congress last year.

The program is intended to encourage automakers to improve fuel efficiency, . . .


I say YES. Instead, the New York Times is trying to say this money should be used just by GM. Now I have no problem with the critical parts of the article about Tesla but I do have a problem with them saying this should negate the intent of these $25 B. Tesla is following the rules and should get the loan. But Randall Stross of the New York Times doesn′t stop there:

Quote:

. . . Earlier this month at the Los Angeles auto show, BMW unveiled its all-electric Mini E, with a smaller battery, a motor with about 20 percent less horsepower than Tesla’s and a shorter range, 150 miles. BMW believes that current technologies used in the all-electric vehicles have not been tested enough in real conditions to be ready to be sold to the public. It will begin by leasing for one year a fleet of 500 Mini E’s for $850 a month each. At the end of the lease term, the cars will be returned to BMW for testing.
. . .


Of course they want to test them:

Here is an example of GM testing their EV1s.

So as I read the article, the author added:

Quote:

. . .
LAST week, I visited the Tesla showroom in Menlo Park, Calif., and took the Roadster out on the highway. As I headed back to the showroom and waited at red lights, ready to hit the accelerator and fly, I realized that I was experiencing a guilty pleasure derived not just from the speed available at my touch but also from temporarily possessing something that shouted to the world its exclusiveness.
. . .


Nothing is wrong with that. The first airplanes were single seaters and the play toys of the rich. So what? New technologies are always expensive and not ready for mass production. But these market leaders are necessary before down-scale systems like the ‘Mini-E’ will ever show up. Except of course, the ‘Mini-E’ isn′t for sale … it is following the GM EV1 marketing plan.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

When trade-shows go bad

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/…_RabgD94˵Rῴ

Quote:

. . .
The crowds at the show are a reluctant bunch this year. Anxious about the economy, the future of the Detroit Three automakers and the unpredictability of gas prices, few said they had any intention of buying a new car anytime soon. Those who did said they were either downsizing or looking for something with top-notch gas mileage. Nearly all had major reservations about a bailout of the U.S. auto industry.

Mohr, 50, said that under normal circumstances, he would be looking for a new car. He recently dumped his Lexus sport utility vehicle, leaving his four-person family with just a Volkswagen Beetle.

But, as he peered at a Jeep Wrangler at the Los Angeles Convention Center, he said the economic downturn has taken a toll on his dentistry business. He’s holding back on any new car purchase for at least another six months.
. . .

"This is the car I came to see," Sorensen said, pointing to Honda Motor Co.’s Insight hybrid, which the Japanese automaker expects to challenge the Toyota Prius when it goes on sale next year. "I’m kind of like, do I go the diesel route, or do I go the hybrid route. Obviously both are a big step in the right direction from where I’m at right now." what does he drive now?
. . .
Ford has the most impressive spread — indeed, it is the only one with enough cash and credit to survive through next year. The Dearborn, Mich., company showed off redesigned Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan sedans unveiled Wednesday, including hybrid models that can go up to 700 miles on one tank of gas. It also sported a giant Mustang display and a miniature Fusion race car track.

The mood was more subdued at GM. Two weeks ago, the automaker canceled the unveilings it had planned for the show, but its Chevrolet Volt — the extended-range electric vehicle that holds many of the company’s hopes for a turnaround — attracted a modest crowd.

Chrysler’s area, however, was almost funereal. Chrysler also abstained from any vehicle debuts, though it did showcase the three electric prototypes — a Dodge, a Jeep and a Town &amp Country minivan — that it unveiled in September.
. . .


Nothing more to add.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

What goes around, comes around …

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/22/bu…QuSa+25qQ+SyAw
(requires no-cost, registration to read)

Quote:

Originally Posted by By MICHELINE MAYNARD

. . .
The Volt is a big long-term bet. New vehicles typically cost $1 billion to develop, and the Volt requires new technology that probably inflated that price tag even more.

G.M. says the car, which is scheduled to arrive in showrooms two years from now, will be able to travel 40 miles on a charge, but it will also have a small gas engine to extend the range to as much as 640 miles using both the battery and gasoline (the 1.4 liter, four-cylinder engine is intended to run a generator that will power the car and recharge the batteries once they are depleted). It is expected to cost about $40,000.
. . .
Many car makers, including Mitsubishi, Nissan and BMW, have plug-ins under development. Toyota said last year that it was working on a plug-in hybrid vehicle that would be available by 2010, meaning it could conceivably beat the Volt.
. . .
It plans to sell only 10,000 Volts in the car’s first year, or less than the number Prius cars sold by Toyota in October alone. And the Volt, roughly the size of a small family sedan, will cost around $15,000 more than a Prius.
. . .


When General Electric was a world-class engineering company, it maintained an active research and development lab. Part of the "tax" of doing business, GE maintained a brain-trust that was available so when a program or project ran into a ‘hard problem,’ there were skill scientists and engineers who could address these problems. So I’m amused as this ‘accounting’ requirement that development costs for a vehicle goes with the vehicle.

Development of a new vehicle is the wrong attitude … it needs to be development of a new technology first expressed in one model but soon adapted across the whole line. So we see in this article the same claim made by "CNW Marketing" about the Prius that the development cost made it much more expensive than the Hummer. So when I see this article citing both GM and the "Ann-Arbor Center for Automotive Research" trying to address the same nonsense they had distributed via the "CNW Marketing" release, well the chickens are coming home to roost.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

Oregon Gov. in China — Not LA Auto Show

Sunday, November 23rd, 2008

http://www.oregonlive.com/business/i…_bring_ch.html

Quote:

SHENZHEN, China — In this far corner of China’s manufacturing heartland, Gov. Ted Kulongoski’s dream of making Oregon home to America’s green car movement is about to roll off the assembly lines.

At BYD Auto Co., China’s fast-growing automotive star, a plug-in electric hybrid sedan is just weeks from meeting millions of Chinese consumers. The ʿDM, which runs up to 80 miles on a single charge and packs a 7-gallon tank, will probably launch in the United States by 2010.

Kulongoski, who clinched a deal last week to bring Nissan’s pure-electric cars to Oregon, is vying for BYD’s bid for a North American pilot site. On Friday, he met with BYD President and Chairman Wang Chuanfu at the company’s mammoth headquarters nearly two hours from China’s booming industrial zone.
. . .


I can think of few actions more critical of US automakers than a governor skipping the LA Auto and going to China to see a plug-in, hybrid. The follow-up comments to the article are not kind to the Governor but neither is gravity to those who believe in ‘castles in the sky.’

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilsoѐweb

Ford’s second hybrid

Friday, November 21st, 2008

http://www.channel4.com/4car/news/ne…?news_id=18392

Quote:

. . .
This hybrid system, developed from that fitted in the Ford Escape/Mercury Mariner, combines a 155bhp 2.4-litre petrol engine, a CVT gearbox, regenerative braking and electric motor.

It can do up to 47mph in electric-only mode, and the total city driving range possible between refuelling stops is more than 700 miles. The Fusion Hybrid gets a special EcoGuide display to help drivers achieve maximum economy, plus special badging, unique 17" wheels, and upholstery made from 100% recycled materials.
. . .


Now this is more like it!

I’m looking forward to a test drive.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

Fisker — What ??

Friday, November 21st, 2008

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Fisker-Automotive-Announces-Intent-Source/story.aspx?guid={405BAF34-4C24-4B14-8BA2-B296F1FED᫖}

Quote:

IRVINE, Calif., Nov 21, 2008 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ — Fisker Automotive, Inc., a green American premium car company, today announced that General Motors has been selected to supply, through its on-highway integrator Powertrain Integration LLC, the gasoline engine that will be used in the Fisker Karma, Fisker Automotive’s new Extended Range Hybrid Electric Vehicle. GM’s Powertrain organization will supply the gasoline engine that generates electricity when the driver has exceeded the 50 mile electric-only range. The 2.0 direct injection, turbo-charged 4-cylinder Ecotec gasoline engine will deliver 260 horsepower. Fisker Automotive is also considering the purchase of several additional GM vehicle components to enhance the Karma.
. . .


Ok, I know Fisker is planning to release a hybrid electric vehicle and I saw their presentation at the June 23 NHTSA hearing. Within 5 minutes, I knew it was time to take a break and they were still talking when I got back. But then this "The 2.0 direct injection, turbo-charged 4-cylinder Ecotec gasoline engine will deliver 260 horsepower." does not make a lick of sense.

I′m sorry but when something sounds too good to be true, it generally is.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

New Oxford Dictionary Word of the Year

Friday, November 14th, 2008

hypermiling

&quotIt is my absolute favorite time of the year on the OUPBlog. Word of the Year time (or WOTY as we call it in the office). Every year the New Oxford American Dictionary prepares for the holidays by making its biggest announcement of the year. The 2008 Word of the Year is (drum-roll please) hypermiling.&quot

http://blog.oup.com/2008/11/hypermiling/

Original post by mdarmistead

Sterling-Electric

Sunday, November 9th, 2008

http://www.unionleader.com/article.a…2-913c8568fb36

Quote:

. . .
&quotIt’s the world’s first Stirling hybrid electric car,&quot its inventor said with a flourish.
Installed in the car’s trunk compartment is a Stirling engine invented at DEKA, Kamen’s technology company in the Manchester Millyard. It powers the features that would normally drain huge power from the battery, notably the defroster and heater.
That leaves the battery primarily for propulsion. "You’re running a pure electric, which is enormously cheaper to operate and enormously more environmentally friendly," Kamen explained.
. . .


The reason this is important is a Stirling engine is an external combustion engine. It runs on any heat source. Now this article is a bit thin on technical details and suggests the Stirling is fairly low power.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

AFS Trinity dust-up

Friday, November 7th, 2008

http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=147907

Quote:

AFS Trinity Power Corporation today announced it pulled its 150 MPG plug-in hybrid SUV prototypes out of the LA Auto Show but will independently exhibit and demonstrate the super fuel-efficient vehicles on their own elsewhere in downtown LA during the show.

The company’s decision followed actions by the LA Auto Show to muzzle AFS Trinity from highlighting the 150 miles per gallon fuel economy of its XH150 prototype vehicles. "The suppression by the automakers of information about technologies such as this raises serious questions about the judgment, vision, intentions and capabilities of the leadership of these companies," said Edward W. Furia, Chairman and CEO of AFS Trinity. "Such conduct by the automakers, who are currently seeking tens of billions of taxpayer dollars, ostensibly to develop fuel efficient vehicle technologies, is evidence they are reluctant to embrace solutions they didn′t invent."

. . .


In this case, I’m sort of with the Auto Show but it does show a real problem. How do we evaluate mixed power source vehicles using MPG, a relic of ordinary gas only vehicles. I don′t know the answer but we’re going to need something that makes sense and is fair.

LATE THOUGHT: If GM and/or Chrysler go out of business, will the new hybrid companies like AFT Trinity, Fisher and Tesla be able to ‘buy a factory’ to retool for their products? Would we see a resurgence of innovation in an industry that seems to be a little ‘behind the power curve?’

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

Panasonic, Sanyo shares soar amid takeover reports

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

Quote:

Sanyo’s powerful lithium-ion battery business for autos is another gem for Panasonic, which can hope for a significant global share when combined with its own battery operations, said Tatsuya Mizuno, director at Fitch Ratings in Tokyo.


http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2…nic-sanyo.html

IIRC, Toyota has an exclusive deal with Panasonic to supply their NiMH batteries for their hybrids. Honda gets theirs from Sanyo.

Original post by spinner

Star Trek sounds

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

http://www.product-reviews.net/2008/…sound-effects/

Quote:

. . .
This is a safety concern, more so for blind people as they cannot hear when one of these vehicles is coming. GM might have found the solution to this problem, and are now thinking of adding a Star Trek soundtrack to their Chevrolet Volt, part of the E-Flex range.

Frank Weber, E-Flex vehicle line executive, has said that he was thinking of adding the sound effects of the transporters or maybe the hissing of the doors opening. . . .


Gosh darn, it sure sounds like they are taking this issue seriously and treating it with the care and respect it deserves.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

Aftermarket hybrids … ?

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Azure-Dynamics-signs-new-agreements/story.aspx?guid={17EDDF83-6EBC-4Eʍ-𐄗-299�EA}

Quote:

Azure Dynamics signs new agreements with eight Ford dealerships

Last update: 12:03 p.m. EDT Oct. 29, 2008
OAK PARK, MI, Oct 29, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ — Azure Dynamics Corporation, a leading developer of hybrid electric and electric powertrains for commercial vehicles, announced today it has signed Sales & Service agreements with eight additional Ford dealerships to represent Azure’s innovative Balance(TM) Hybrid Electric commercial truck. This brings the total number of dealerships to fourteen since the enrollment program began in June.
. . .


It may make sense to have one or more, after-manufacture companies that handle hybrid conversions of cars that American companies apparently can’t handle. In particular, I’m thinking front wheel drive cars have an unpowered, rear axle. Speculation on my part but a powered, bolt-in rear axle, battery and control electronics integrated into the vehicle control systems might work.

This is not an original idea because there is a company that sells motors that fit in the drive shaft of rear wheel drive cars. Their system is (was) a drive only without regenerative braking. However, it allows large vehicles to move with plug-in, electric support. By handling the engine inefficient ranges, it helps.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

GM, Chrysler want $10 billion US bailout to help them merge: report

Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

http://www.cbc.ca/money/story/2008/10/28/auto-aid.html

General Motors and Cerberus Capital Management, which owns Chrysler, have asked the U.S. government for around $10 billion US in an unprecedented rescue package to support a merger between the two car companies, two sources with direct knowledge of the talks have told Reuters.

:omg:

I′m no money guy, no idea how much of this is real panic in the auto industry or if this is just the auto industry jumping onto the bank bailout quick money grab bandwagon

*sigh*

Original post by Ontario07Civic

Old article on ‘Prius Classic’ - NHW11

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1450/…popularArticle

Quote:

. . .
Toyota Hybrid System (THS)

The Prius is propelled by a parallel hybrid system, in which two drive sources are employed either separately or simultaneously - a petrol engine and an electric motor.
The electric motor - drawing from a large hybrid battery - serves as the sole power source in instances when the petrol engine is relatively inefficient; this includes driving conditions such as slow-moving traffic jams, sitting stationary, deceleration, light acceleration and low speed cruise. Under these conditions, the electric motor is relied upon for drive, and the petrol engine is automatically switched off - completely eliminating fuel consumption and tailpipe emissions.
. . .


Yes, I know it is an older article, 2002, it is well written and may be new to some folks.

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web

Hybrid bus problems — batteries

Saturday, October 18th, 2008

http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/519770

Quote:

Tess Kalinowski
Transportation reporter
The TTC is going back to buying diesel buses because the batteries on its newer hybrid diesel-electric models are proving too "hit and miss."

An existing order for 130 hybrids next year will go ahead, but next week TTC staff will recommend the commission approve a $61 million order for "clean diesel" buses in 2010.
. . .
The remaining 2009 hybrids will be delivered with Chrysler’s new lithium-ion batteries rather than the lead-acid cells already in use on the TTC fleet. The TTC wants to test the newer batteries but isn’t prepared to commit to that technology, said spokesperson Brad Ross, who didn’t rule out the possibility of trying hybrids again after the 2010 order.
. . .
Batteries [lead-acid rjw] that should be lasting five years are surviving only about 18 months, which affects service because those buses have to come off the road for repairs, he said.
. . .
It was hoped the hybrid buses would save 20 to 30 per cent on fuel but they are achieving only about a 10 per cent saving, he said.
. . .


Understand that there is no universal hybrid solution and an electric hybrid is not always the best solution. In the case of heavy vehicles like buses and medium to large service trucks, a hydraulic system makes a lot of sense because hydraulics can handle huge energy bursts needed for buses and trucks. In fact, I’m somewhat disappointed that GM/Chrysler/Daimler two-mode was electric based instead of hydraulic.

My Prius studies have expanded to batteries and I’m finding them to be ‘good news’ and ‘bad news.’ Yes, they help establish an electric capability in our vehicles allowing limited range, electric operation. However, batteries are finicky and difficult to properly use. Worse, they have severe limits on how much ‘impulse’ power they can absorb or release.

One last thing, hybrid performance is very route and driving profile sensitive. There is a reason why hybrid skeptics prefer ‘long distance’ highway test routes, they don’t have to deal with inertial losses from start and stop driving profiles.

What is interesting in this article is the failure of lead-acid batteries, the ones we have the most experience with. I am by no means a battery expert but to have life-time issues with lead-acid suggests something is terribly wrong with the control laws of these hybrids.

GOOD NEWS! Used hybrid buses may soon become available at affordable prices!!!

Bob Wilson

Original post by bwilson4web