Archive for the ‘biofuel’ Category

Londoner gets to try out the new Th!nk city EV

Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Filed under: ,

Danny Fleet is a Londoner with an interest in electric cars. His attituce should come as no surprise given that EVs can avoid the city’s congestion charge. Currently, Danny happens to drive one of the ever-popular G-Wiz quadricycles. Danny was lucky enough to be in the area when one of the new second-generation Th!nk city electric cars arrived fresh from the factory in Norway and he got to check it out as soon as they unloaded it from the truck. He recorded video of his tour and his first drive and came away very impressed.

The Th!nk has some pretty decent specs, starting with the fact that it’s actually type approved in Europe as an actual car not a quadricycle. To get that type approval it has to be crash tested and meet safety requirements, something quadricycles don’t. Th!nk claims the lithium polymer battery will provide a range of 125 miles on a charge and the top speed of 65mph. It’s fitted with safety equipment like air bags, seat belts and even ABS. Th!nk will be selling the car in the UK for £14,000 and charging and extra £100 per month for a battery rental. If the charge capacity of the battery falls too low, they will replace it as part of the rental deal. Check out Danny’s videos here and here.

[Source: Danny’s Contentment]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments


BOLD MOVES: THE FUTURE OF FORD Step behind the curtain at Ford Motor. Experience the documentary first-hand.

Original post by Sam Abuelsamid

USDA says biofuels are not to blame for high food prices

Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Filed under: , , , ,


Certainly not an unbiased observer, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has issued an economic analysis that reveals that crops grown for biofuels (in the U.S., that means mostly soybeans for biodiesel and corn for ethanol) are not responsible for the recent increase in food prices. In fact, the USDA found that just about anything but biofuels are to blame: high energy prices, increasing global demand, drought and other factors are all called “primary drivers” of the increased food costs. The National Biodiesel Board liked what it heard, and has put out a statement saying that the USDA analysis “affirms wisdom of U.S. biofuels policy” (read it after the jump). The USDA’s food and fuel website is here. Last month, the Grocery Manufacturers Association issued a statement that claimed just the opposite of what the USDA is saying, and we all know that this debate has gone on for a long while. There is little reason to believe the USDA will have the last word. Who’s up next?

Press Release:

USDA Shows High Oil Prices, Other Factors Drive up Food Prices

Affirms Wisdom of U.S. Biofuels Policy

WASHINGTON, May 20 /PRNewswire/ — The U.S. Department of Agriculture released economic analysis that shows high energy prices, increasing global demand, drought and other factors — not biofuels — are the primary drivers of higher food costs. During a briefing on the case for food and fuel yesterday, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer pointed to the fact that oil prices have broken through a series of price ceilings this year.

“Developing diversity in our portfolio of fuels is if anything an even more urgent matter than it has been in the past. And it is one that remains central to our energy security and our national security,” Schafer said. “The policy choices we have made on biofuels will deliver long-term benefits.”

Schafer pointed to International Energy Agency data that show global biofuels production has cut consumption of crude oil by 1 million barrels a day, offering savings of $120 million dollars a day.

The National Biodiesel Board praised the Secretary for speaking out on the recent attacks on biofuels. “There has been a feeding frenzy on biofuels as the reason for higher food prices, and those accusations are unfounded,” said Joe Jobe, CEO of the NBB. “It is encouraging to see USDA documenting some of the real reasons for increased food prices. The American public is being duped on this issue.”

Last week, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) released a plan by the Grocery Manufacturers Association to discredit biofuels, calling their attempts to blame biofuels for food price increases “outrageous and misplaced.” He blasted the plan as an “effort to undermine and denigrate the patriotic achievement of America’s farmers to reduce our dependence on foreign oil while also providing safe and affordable food.”

USDA has posted economic analysis and charts (http://www.usda.gov/) that document that “even with the current uptick in food price inflation, it is much lower than it was in the 1970s and early 1980.”

Schafer criticized efforts to repeal biofuels policy but urged the focus to stay on long-term solutions. He pointed to the benefits of work to increase global agricultural productivity, which is important to developing countries food and energy needs. “The need for food and fuel is only going to grow,” Schafer said.

The NBB is the national trade association of the biodiesel industry and is the coordinating body for biodiesel research and development in the U.S. Its membership is comprised of biodiesel producers, state, national, and international feedstock and feedstock processor organizations, fuel marketers and distributors, and technology providers.

For more details on biodiesel, visit http://www.biodiesel.org/.

[Source: National Biodiesel Board]

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Original post by Sebastian Blanco

Biofuel-friendly Farm Bill gets veto override from Congress

Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Filed under: , , , ,


Photo by Yandle. Licensed under Creative Commons license 2.0.

As expected, Congress made sure the Farm Bill (actually called the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008) became law yesterday despite some sort of clerical error that resulted in a number of pages being dropped from the final version. Democrats were embarrassed. The Senate voted 82 to 13 to override President Bush’s veto. The Farm Bill contains a lot of biofuel-friendly sections, as we detailed the other day. To mention a few of the provisions: Cellulosic ethanol producers have their eye on $348m in new tax credits for the second-generation biofuel. The bill also includes grants worth $320m to build biorefineries to make advanced biofuels and $70m for farmers to grow switchgrass for energy.

So, who’s happy about the new law? A good number of people, including Howard Learner, executive director of the Environmental Law and Policy Center, who said the energy “programs are good for all Americans — they are a win-win-win for our energy security, environment, and economy.” Farm Press talked to a handful of economists and found the bill to be a “mixed bag.”

[Source: WaPo, Environmental Law and Policy Center, Farm Press, AP]

 

Read | Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Original post by Sebastian Blanco

AFVI 2008: A few final thoughts on green moves in Sin City, with Wendell Berry

Wednesday, December 31st, 1969

Filed under: , , , ,

I covered the AFVI Expo last week and that trip was my first visit to Las Vegas. I’ve heard the stories, the advertising campaign that tries to sell Sin City as, well, Sin City that takes your credit card. What interested me the most, though, was how my environmentalist mind would react to being in a city that, quite honestly, celebrates excess and waste. I didn’t expect to feel comfortable in an oasis of VIP come-ons and bright lights surrounded by a harsh desert. I arrived in town around noon and, during my lunch at a quite reasonable buffet (Indian food, not one of those with endless tables featuring every food ever), I happened to read Wendel Berry’s essay Faustian Economics from the latest issue of Harper’s. Whoops.

Berry, who wrote an astounding collection of essays called The Long-Legged House back in 1969, takes on biofuels in the Harper’s essay. Well, he starts with biofuels and smoothly segues into a discussion of limits, reductions and how it will ever be possible to really come to terms with the way we’re consuming the world’s resources. More thoughts on this after the break.

It was odd to read an essay about learning to live withing our limits in a city that tries so to make you forget that there is any such thing. Whether we’re talking about food, money, drinks, sex, fun or whatever else you want, Las Vegas is where limits go to die. And to think, this is where the Alternative Fuel Vehicle Institute has found a home. Of course, Vegas is much more than the Strip and the casinos, but that’s what is shoved in a visitor’s face from second one. Just like there’s more to Vegas than meets the eye, there is much more to the idea of limits, and limiting our consumption of all sorts of items, than gets shoved upon us in our daily life. Berry writes:

[There is a] dogged belief that what we call the American Way of Life will prove somehow indestructible. We will keep on consuming, spending, wasting, and driving, as before, at any cost to anything and everybody but ourselves. This belief was always indefensible - the real names of global warming are Waste and Greed - and by now it is manifestly foolish.

While I leave it to you to search out the full article (Harper’s doesn’t make its contents available online unless you are a subscriber, so you’ll have to do so or head over to your local library or newstand and find the May 2008 issue) and read the elegant way that Berry begins (and ends) his article speaking about biofuels but then spends the bulk of the article arguing that the best way to live a fuller life now is to better understand our limits. In the same way that every painting has a limit (be it the canvas or the size of a wall) but not every painting has yet been created, Berry argues (and I agree) that human life can be improved by turning down the snake oil of a limitless future with a rediscovery of living within our means, both economic and environmental. In Berry’s words:

We will have to start over, with a different and much older premise: the naturalness and, for creatures of limited intelligence, the necessity, of limits. We must learn again to ask how we can make the most of what we are, what we have, what we have been given. If we always have a theoretically better substitute available from somebody or someplace else, we will never make the most of everything.

I don’t want to misrepresent what Berry says. He is in favor of “green” alternatives like biofuels and other alternative energy sources, but only “provided they make sense.” As much as we like to cover the latest petroleum alternatives here on AutoblogGreen, we can’t deny the fact that the biggest improvement you can make to your transportation carbon footprint is to simply drive less. What Berry argues so well - and the whole reason I bring this to your attention - is that driving (and consuming) less does not mean our lives are somehow less full, less brilliant, less worthwhile. In fact, getting used to living with limits now is really the smartest thing we can do. Berry writes:

And so, in confronting the phenomenon of “peak oil,” we are really confronting the end of our customary delusion of “more.” Whichever way we turn, from now on, we are going to find a limit beyond which there will be no more. To hit these limits at top speed is not a rational choice.

Well said. So well said, in fact, that I couldn’t let what I read in Vegas stay in Vegas.

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments

Original post by Sebastian Blanco